Other Duties (as assigned)

Other Duties (as assigned)

Share this post

Other Duties (as assigned)
Other Duties (as assigned)
Does it matter if books and ideas are technically "banned"?

Does it matter if books and ideas are technically "banned"?

Structural racism is real; the continued use of the "literacy test" playbook for censorship and disenfranchisement of marginalized groups proves it.

Steve Nuzum's avatar
Steve Nuzum
Jun 18, 2024
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Other Duties (as assigned)
Other Duties (as assigned)
Does it matter if books and ideas are technically "banned"?
1
Share

Today the bureaucrats are issuing certificates to vote to people who cannot read the ballot nor even the instructions on a ballot or on a voting machine… The left wing liberals need as many illiterates as they can get to vote in order to keep them in power.

-George Wallace, 1965 (cited by ProPublica)

It happened whether it offends you or not. Quite a bit of it offends me, but there’s nothing I can do about it.

-Octavia Butler, Kindred

Donate (Venmo)

Donate (Paypal)

The 1965 Voter Rights Act formally prohibited states, for five years, from administering “literacy tests” to disenfranchise voters. (Significantly, it didn’t end all literacy requirements; states could still, for example, require that voters complete a minimum level of schooling, which is sure to have had the effect of preventing many poor and marginalized citizens from voting.)

These tests were a clear example of de facto discrimination— a way of using state power to oppress specific groups or classes without explicitly passing laws that did so (which would…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Other Duties (as assigned) to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Steve Nuzum
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share