Updates: this piece has been updated to reflect a statement from Mary Wood. Huddle, Baynham, and Loveless have not responded to requests for comment. In addition, it has been updated to reflect Moms for Liberty’s formal endorsement of Catherine Huddle and Jayson Baynham on its national website.
English teacher Mary Wood made national headlines last year when students in her AP Language and Composition class complained that she was teaching Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me, and that by doing so she was somehow violating a vague proviso based on a defunct Trump administration Executive Order, which has was originally introduced by members of the South Carolina Freedom Caucus. The proviso, which uses language originally intended to prevent federal employees from being required to complete diversity training, has been renewed for the past several years in the state budget.
While the book has not yet been banned statewide in South Carolina, Lexington- Richland School District 5 took the controversial step of prohibiting Wood from using it last year— and did so without following the formal process the district had set up for considering book challenges from community members.
As Coates himself summarizes Woods’ experiences in his new book The Message,
She was a teacher in South Carolina who had been forced to drop Between the World and Me from her lesson plan because it made some of her students, in their words, “feel uncomfortable” and “ashamed to be Caucasian”. Moreover, they were sure that the very subject of the book— “systemic racism”— was “illegal”….
I tracked down Mary’s number. We spoke for about half an hour. She talked about the whole ordeal— the paranoia incited by anonymous complaints; the school board meetings, where she was pilloried; the threats to her job.
This week, the Ohio-based Super PAC Defeating Communism sent out mailers in the district supporting three Lexington-Richland 5 school board candidates: Moms-for-Liberty-endorsed Jason Baynham, incumbent Catherine Huddle, and former board member Ken Loveless (who has most recently been in the news for ethics fines related to conflicts of interest during his last term on the school board). Baynham and Huddle have both been formally endorsed by Moms for Liberty on its national website. The three candidates have often been operating as a unit during the election.
The mailers included Wood’s name and image, and connected her ominously with the idea that “CONTROVERSY IS REARING AROUND OUR SCHOOLS”.
Wood and her family are now again concerned for their safety.
“Everyone should know what has happened, the dangers they have placed not only on me and my family, but on my colleagues and the students at the schools in this district,” Wood said in a group message among public education supporters, in reference to the mailer.
In a social media post today, Wood said she was unable to go to go to work because of concerns for herself, her students, and her family.
My students' parents received these flyers associating me with communism. My children's friends' parents saw my face linked with communism. Unhinged people who believe that communists are worthy of the worst retribution received flyers with my face on them…
I could not go to work today. It was a safety issue, not just for me and my family, but for all of the children at my school, in my classrooms, and for the children at my daughter's school…
I am a parent. I am a teacher. I am a daughter, a wife, a sister, a friend. And now I am scared for my life, for my family members' lives, for my students' lives, and my friends' lives. All over a school board race. All over a book.
Across the country, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, threats against teachers, librarians, and other school staff have increased. Louisiana librarian Amanda Jones begins her book That Librarian, with a representative message she received for maintaining a diverse library collection:
Amanda, you are indoctrinating our children with perversion + pedophilia grooming. Your evil agenda is getting print + national coverage. Congrats. Continue with your LGBT agenda on our children cause we gunna put ur fat evil commie PEDO azz in the dirt very soon bitch. You can’t hide. We know where you work + live… you have a LARGE target on your back. Click, click… see you soon…
School board groups like the National School Boards Association were so concerned with the growing threats to school staff and contentiousness and even violence at school board meetings that in 2021 they asked for federal assistance. (In response to the NSBA’s please, local politicians successfully pressured the South Carolina School Boards Association to break from the national organization.)
It seems, then, that much of the backlash against the mailers is based on a genuine concern for the safety of Wood and other school staff, as well as that of their families.
The candidates deny responsibility, but Baynham and Loveless acknowledge donations.
According to a Federal Election Commission filing, Baynham donated $1,000 to the Super PAC, and someone donated $14,000 under the name of Loveless’ wife.
Today, after backlash online, all three candidates released statements denying responsibility for the content of the mailers. Loveless and Baynham each acknowledged they had made contributions to the super PAC responsible for the mailers.
None of the statements today mentioned Wood by name, or expressed regret that their donations had been used to attack a teacher who was, notably, not a candidate for office, but a current employee of the district they were campaigning to oversee.
Although Loveless and Baynham both suggested they would have been prohibited from speaking with the super PAC, actual FEC rules governing candidate coordination with super PACs are considerably looser in the wake of the Citizens United court decision.
According to the Brennan Center, candidates can and often do speak with super PACs, and there are loopholes that may even allow for some unofficial coordination between candidates and super PACs. (It is also much more difficult to know what super PACs are up to, since many of their donors do not have to be disclosed, so even if a candidate isn’t, themselves, working directly with the super PAC, others close to the candidate might do so.) Similarly, ProPublica explains that “So long as candidates and Super PACs don’t discuss the particulars of their election spending — such as exactly where or how long their election ads will run — they’re free to discuss strategy and candidates can even help fundraise.”
Indeed, the FEC filing for Defeating Communism shows that the only donations from individuals reported during the period that references the candidates are from Loveless and Baynham; the remaining $18,000 in donations comes from “other political committees (such as PACs)”. Those donations seem to have come from the Advance Liberty PAC (which, according to an analysis by Open Secrets, primarily targets the construction and energy sectors).
Huddle, who , donated over $300 to Loveless’ campaign this cycle according to state ethics reports; Loveless donated a roughly identical amount to Huddle’s campaign; Loveless Commercial Contracting (the business involved in Loveless’s ethics fine during his last term) donated an additional $500 to Huddle’s campaign. Huddle also received a $1000 donation from a PAC affiliated with Florida governor Ron DeSantis (Great American Comeback).
As of this writing, none of the candidates have responded to requests for comment sent to their official campaign websites this morning.
Scott Herring, a music professor, and Mike Ward, an entrepreneur, are also running for seats on the board.
This piece will be updated if any of the candidates respond to requests for comment.
They don't actually deny working with them either. None of us have ever done anything we're not allowed to do, right?
The three candidates take exception to being connected (unfairly they aver) to what is nothing less than a fatwa against a teacher in their school district. Instead of rushing to the defense of a district employee, which is what competent leadership would look like, they all play the victim over the fact this mailer deflects from their campaigns or the important issues in their district.
This vendetta against the teacher cannot be provably traced back to them by courtroom standards - but we are not in a courtroom. In conversation, in digital forums, and in the voting booths we enter, we need not reduce ourselves to absurdly naïve droids who cannot see what's happening.
This reminds me of mob "hits" that cannot be traced back to the Don. The legal machinery does not first have to pull its load before we can exercise the logic and common sense to fill in the winks and nods and diabolical laughter that flows from the disparaging words and condemnation (of a teacher, in this case) to the predictable terror that others unleash upon her.
Even if we can believe they didn't pull the trigger on this mailer, we saw and heard them light the fuse that they and the mailer hope to ignite in their deputies, capos and rogue henchmen.